Aractus

Blog of Daniel Baxter, now secure! :)

Free SSL from Let's Encrypt!

Archive for January, 2012

Is global warming just bad science – or is it something more, is there an actual conspiracy at work? How would you feel if you knew for certain that CO2 is not causing any harm to our planet? What if I told you that predictions of the amount of CO2, the amount of warming, and the effect on the environment have all been falling despite the fact that every year global warming is painted as “getting worse all the time” and “the greatest environmental issue” facing us in our lifetime? Did you even know scientific documents were altered to support the conclusion of anthropogenic climate change? If it’s really real, would they really need to alter scientific documents?

In this entry we’re going to examine the systematic lies and fraud carried out by the scientists and respected environmentalists that have convinced the world that there is a global problem of climate change. I will show that the deception is intentional. This fact alone will prove that there exists a conspiracy.

I am often criticized and ridiculed for my views. My Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was also criticized and ridiculed for his views, and then he was flogged and crucified by the Romans. I hope Jesus forgives me when I enter heaven for my errs.

Most non-Christians have a certain respect for Christians. The same cannot be said for us Global Warming Sceptics. For us, we are looked down upon from people who rely only on media reporting of the climate issue, or worse still: politicians like Al Gore and Julia Gillard who have absolutely no concept of science whatsoever. No, we are treated as if we are “evil tobacco companies” and “holocaust deniers”.

If you have read my previous blog entries you will see I don’t write about things I simply “want to believe” because “I’m selfish”, I tackle some of the most difficult issues there are – how many people do you know who would write a blog entry exposing the child porn industry for what it is? If you read what I wrote in my previous entry on child porn, you will see that what I say is true, not “convenient”. Convenient would have been to assert that we can solve this problem with legislation. Interesting, isn’t it, that this too is an issue some people think can be solved with legislation alone?

Think about traditionally neutral ground. Neutral language, thoughts, ideas and aspirations. Medicine, Food, Health, Environment, Enterprise, Education, Leadership, Culture, Community, Rural, Urban, etc. How many of these, once neutral, words now have a special meaning for the Political Left. Who also believe they have a monopoly on words like “Ignorance”, “Polution”, “Extremeisim”, “Discrimination”, “Racist” and “Bigoted”. These things that outlaw us from the free expression for or against a culture or religion or political alliance. The most racist person I know – who believe me is very racist – has a very highly developed understanding of many cultures and to call him “ignorant of other cultures” would be very wrong. You see, although the Left paints the idea that you cannot have a strong understanding of other cultures and still be racist, it’s a lie. In the same way they paint the idea that either you have a very good understanding of environmental issues and agree with them, or you’re ignorant.

Let’s pick an “environmental” issue to show you how this can work. Sealing. Sealing is common in Canada, especially where Seal numbers are so high they endanger the fishing industry. Seals are a bit like Cattle – they have many uses once killed – including food, clothing, oil, etc. They are generally killed with a special “club” called a hakapik, which kills them instantly. However environmental organizations tell you to oppose Sealing on the basis of cruelty, or just for the sake that seals are cute and wonderful creatures. They basically make up or inflate problems and then highlight them. Another example here in Australia would be mulesing – a procedure done to sheep to prevent flystrike. Flystrike is one of the most horrible things that can happen to any farm animal, and results in either weeks of agony for the animal or death, whereas mulesing is a one-time procedure to cut the skin away to prevent flystrike. Again, environmental organizations tell us to be opposed to mulesing on the basis of animal cruelty. And, of course, if we oppose them we’re labelled as ignorant or as not caring about the environment, etc.

With Carbon Dioxide it’s even more inflated. CO2 is part of the Greenhouse Effect. But now Carbon Dioxide is being labelled as “pollution” by Julia Gillard and others. This makes about as much sense as labelling mulesing or sealing “pollution”. It shows me that the Left believe that they can label something as pollution if they want to and expect everyone to agree. Of course if we wanted to label their verbal diarrhoea, hysteria and scaremongering as pollution, we’d be in-turn labelled “ignorant” or “crackpot”. God forbid we should actually feed the hungry of the world before worrying about CO2 levels.

Climitegate implicates many of the main scientists involved in anthropogenic climate change science, namely Michael Mann from the USA, Phil Jones from the UK, Tom Wigley – an advisor to Al Gore, and others. Even climate scientists show their little faith in some of these figures, for instance palaeontologist Eduardo Zorita writes (03-05-06) “Even considering the considerable pressure that he has [sic] is exposed to in American politics, I think Michael Mann is unable of any constructive discussion.” He was writing to Tim Osborn and Keith Briffa, two very important climate scientists in the UK. Osborn’s webpage has a small note about the “hacking”.

Here is another excerpt, this time from Keith Briffa: “I really hope that we can get an atmosphere of constructive discussion that , I believe, must include some discussion of the sceptics .”

Climategate to sceptics like myself, is the smoking gun of deliberate collaboration and deception. We have them admitting that it was their own doing in encouraging sceptics to submit papers to peer-review, and then collaborating to say things to the extent of “we’ll tell the media we don’t read those papers because as far as we’re concerned it’s not peer review” as well as emails demonstrating that they’ve been trying to have submitted peer review papers removed. If they really have nothing to worry about, then it shouldn’t matter to them what’s being submitted to peer review and they could refute it scientifically, rather than trying to have the documents removed from peer review or declaring that they’re not actually peer review.

The problem here is that it highlights the abundant errors and omissions in their own so-called science. The scientists involved in Climategate have already made their minds up that global warming is caused by human activity, and do see any problem with manipulating the data to support their conclusions. And in the next entry I will take you through much of the science to show you exactly how it was manipulated to make it look like we are facing the worst trend of global warming in over a millennia.

I don’t hope that you’re convinced one way or the other on Global Warming, I just hope that you are ready to start from a neutral ground. The onus of proof is on the person making the claim – in this case, the climate scientist who tells you that climate change is anthropogenic. Next time we tackle the science head-on.

HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL: Blowing the lid off the multibillion dollar industry.

Child pornography laws in Australia are prohibitively, and ludicrously, strict. Child Porn is a child protection issue; yet there has been a conviction of a man for having depictions of Simpsons characters engaging in incest; and even photographs of women over 18 with an A-cup size is considered “child porn”. Never mind the discrimination issues against women with smaller breasts; never mind the fact that these cases do not involve the abuse of children. If we ban A-cups shouldn’t we also ban pornography where men and women have shaved public hair? Further, there is no tolerance whatsoever on the law; if for instance you were to discover a trove of somebody’s illegal child pornography and hand it in to police – more than likely you would be charged just for handling it.

The legality and politics of this is all backwards: it does not help children or society. Well meaning politicians are targeting the wrong places for making any real difference. I will reveal to you the detailed structure of where the pornography comes from, how it is uploaded to the internet for sale, and how it is marketed and sold all over the world and how you might even be helping to market it. I have had sleepless nights debating whether to censor some details – because I’m certain the information can be used to access child porn relatively easily. But to be perfectly honest with you – it’s out there anyway, it isn’t difficult to find, it’s advertised, those who want it already know how to access it and at least I can shed light on this highly controversial issue for those who may want to bury their heads in the sand.

Following its decriminalization in 1967, in 1969 Denmark became the first country in the world to legalize pornography. Color Climax, and other companies surfaced and began producing all kinds of pornography ranging from “traditional porn” (straight sex between adults), to bestiality (mainly featuring Bodil Joensen) to child porn. Through the 70’s Color Climax, and others, produced thousands of videos (8mm) and magazines. They regularly filmed photographed, and distributed, girls aged between 7 and 12 years old having sex with boys and with men, as well as plenty of “underage porn” (performers under 18 but past puberty). The material is still widely available on the internet; although there may be un-scanned magazines and 8mm films which exist only outside the internet.

After allowing it to be legally produced and distributed for a decade, at the end of 1979 Denmark banned child porn. But the effects of its decade-long legality are everlasting, Denmark could be considered responsible for creating modern bestiality and child pornography. Naked and erotically-posed clothed images of children were still produced, not just in Denmark but in plenty of countries all over the world. Some people and jurisdictions also consider this child porn; regardless today it is distributed by the Russians alongside the Danish material.

Traci Lords, the notorious underage performer from the USA in the 80’s, stared in numerous films. She wasn’t a victim – she was the one to take advantage of pornographers, but it’s still child porn. To distinguish it from hardcore material depicting children younger than 12, I will refer to this material as Underage Porn. Debatably, some Danish companies possibly continued production of underage porn illegally into the 80’s. In countries where pornography is illegal, like the Middle East, there are usually no laws dealing specifically with child pornography, and any active pornographers in these regions may also produce some amount of underage porn. This material to most of us may be indistinguishable from legal 18+ pornography.

Today it is believed that the Russians are responsible for the distribution and sale of most of the child pornography on the internet. The hardcore material (images depicting actual sex) come from: 1. Denmark, 2. Parents who abused their children and shared the images, 3. Paedophile rings who photographed themselves abusing children, 4. Softcore images which have been photoshopped. The softcore material (nude only, or erotically clothed children) comes from all over the world where, like Denmark, it was produced legally. The idea that it comes from Russia is a myth – it’s only distributed by Russians, and I’ll explain why shortly. By the way, the material from parents abusing their children is worse than the Danish material as it depicts: incest, rape, torture, crying children, etc. The “respectable” Danish companies making child porn did not create that kind of material.

In Russia pornography is, and always has been, illegal. There are no specific laws regarding child porn, and possession of pornography is not an offence. Russians have been able to collect the material without fear of prosecution. And they distribute all of it mixed together.

The pornography is loaded onto a server in a datacentre somewhere in the world – it makes no difference where, although reportedly the USA is no longer preferred for this. The data is put into a secure, encrypted partition on the server, for instance using TrueCrypt. This makes the content completely secure – no authorities can open or view the content even if they seize the server. The server is configured to only be accessible through a secure SSH connection from specific servers somewhere else in the world. These servers will act as proxies for the Russians to upload content and for customers to access and/or download content (I will explain the difference shortly). The proxy servers have no content on them (or at least no illegal pornographic content), have their logs disabled, and can only be accessed using a secure interface, thus the content is completely secure and encrypted all the way using SSH and SSL, there is no way for the outside world to see what is being accessed or stored – similar to using your credit card online. The crime is undetectable and untraceable.

From the dawn of the internet age, child porn has always been advertised – first in usenet and forums and today mostly through spam email. Spam bots data-mine email address books of infected computers, and send spam is from them. There’s a good chance you have actual child pornography in your spam folder; or if your computer has ever been infected with a virus – have sent emails containing child porn and links to child porn to others. The viruses used to be mostly Trojans, but the Russians have now learned to use Rootkits which install “undetected” as drivers in your system.

Child pornography is believed to be a multibillion dollar industry. It is very real, and everyone – you, I, and children alike receive the same spam emails. Back when I was a kid I used to open emails I knew were spam just for the hell of it – imagine today how many children are being exposed to pornography including child porn through spam?

A couple of paragraphs back I said that there is a difference between accessing and downloading the illegal content. It is now possible for paedophiles to access the material they want – view it, listen to it – without downloading it. You see the Russians are clever – they’re able to create rootkit viruses to market their material, and they know how to set up virtual workstations too. Creating a virtual workstation on a server allows their customers to access all the material within it without transferring any actual files and thus leaving no evidence of their existence whatsoever on their systems.

Virtual workstations, on secure and encrypted remote servers, accessed securely with a secure password. It goes without saying that internet-filtering does nothing to hinder the spread of child porn on the internet, because all the Russians have to do is set up new access points (web addresses) and update the email links in the spam they send. Which they do all the time anyway. Just about every country who has created internet blacklists have had those lists leaked, including Australia, Thailand, Russia, France, etc – and those lists contain direct links to child pornography: the perfect gift for paedophiles, and free advertising for the Russians. The leaked Russian list, for instance, is supposed to be made up of about 50% child porn URL’s! I can’t think of a better way to advertise the material to paedophiles than these internet blacklists. Anyone, and I mean anyone, in the world can buy webhosting from another country and set up their own private proxy-server which would allow them to access anything on the blacklists. So even trying to block proxy servers won’t help.

Because people don’t want to know about it, or want to bury their heads in the sand, they are not calling for the real action that needs to be done; but to be honest everyone can do their part in reducing exposure of child pornography – don’t let children see their spam emails, invest in antivirus software and always keep your system up to date.

But above all politicians need to stop fearing it and spreading the wrong messages. The content is out there, and it’s been out there being traded and duplicated and sold and resold for decades, nothing can be done about that now. Internet filtering is ineffective, cracking down on possession – even in Russia – is ineffective. Trying to locate the servers is a waste of time. Unless they’ve made a huge mistake, you won’t find them and if you do the content won it will be invisible, and today the network – or rather the conspiracy – is very well organized. The only vulnerable point for authorities to catch them is where the money changes hands: but even this is not the best way to tackle the problem. Falsified or stolen identities (stolen from computers using the same spam bots) are used to create the bank accounts, and the cash taken out at ATM’s.

The best way to tackle the problem is if we all do our part to make our computers secure, so that we shut down the spam industry, then the Russians will need to look for a new way to market the material. Because in the end this is a child protection issue, and it should be treated as such. Prosecuting people for possession of nude images of children, or depictions of cartoon characters engaging in incest is ridiculous and fails common sense; children are not affected one way or the other. A lot of people believe there would be utopia if we had no laws, on the contrary Denmark proved very clearly that once you don’t have a law against child pornography people will indeed produce it, sell it, and buy it. But legislation can only do so much, especially when the crimes take place abroad.

— 13-01-12 Appendix —

It has been my unfortunate role to report to you on matters in which people have risen to the top – prospered that is – from cheating, lying, and abusing others (raping & pillaging). I didn’t originally want to do a blog article on Child Pornography: but I couldn’t ignore it for two reasons. 1. I treat pornography in general as a child protection issue: and we don’t do enough for our children to teach them against the things that porn promotes – and those things are promiscuity without condoms, and raping & pillaging. 2. Because this topic is so controversial it is not talked about, and people have huge misconceptions about the issue, and I needed to set the record straight; especially when it comes to internet filtering which will not hinder the spread of child porn, because it is run as a criminal enterprise and already the IP and web addresses are being updated all the time in the face of existing blacklists.

I sincerely hope that you read this as a warning. A warning that ignorance of the issue is our biggest weakness in rising up against it.

I don’t think it creates paedophiles. But I think it does give them validation in their sexuality and allows them to think that they are normal.

Effects of the industry can be felt by performers after they leave the industry. One example is Robert Kerman – he was highly sought after by pornographers during the 70s and 80s when he was active in the industry because of his ability to act, which would land him in significant and lead roles. However his highly successful pornographic past made it difficult for him to land similar roles in mainstream movies – and although he did have some success working with Italian filmmakers, he was unable to carry the success on to mainstream American film and television. Kerman has since stated that he regrets being a porn actor because it stunted/crippled his acting career for mainstream roles.

In 2004 there was a significant HIV outbreak in the US porn industry. At the time I felt largely indifferent to this, recently after hearing “Lara Roxx” speak about her infection, my mind was changed significantly. Darren James caught HIV in Brazil and then brought it back with him to the USA and spread it to other female performers before his HIV status could be accurately diagnosed. It has been determined that he caught HIV from actress Bianca Biaggi for the movie Split That Booty 2. Roxx caught AIDS from James when they filmed a scene for the same movie (Split That Booty 2) in America. The movie itself contains the scenes where James “contracts HIV from Biaggi”, and where Roxx contracts it from James – even though the actors caught HIV in these scenes, they were used in the film anyway.

Now I use quotations because you can’t take the word of a porn star. James never told his family about his career until they found out about it following his HIV contraction. He lied to his own family. Biaggi insists that she caught HIV from James; and in actual fact in Brazil they usually always use condoms – it was the American pornographers that had Biaggi and James perform unprotected double-anal together. James is known to have infected three women – Roxx, Miss Arroyo, and Jessica Dee. 4 people if he infected Biaggi too. And besides James, Biaggi apparently did not infect anyone – probably because she was usually using condoms for the Brazilian pornographers. So the claim that the Americans made that Biaggi gave James HIV and not the other way around cannot be proven, and I think it is pathetic of them to conspire to set up the Brazilians to be the scapegoats.

At the time the USA adult industry’s preferred STI testing clinic was AIM, and every single straight and/or lesbian pornographic actor working in San Fernando Valley, California got tested there at least once a month (gay pornography usually does not involve HIV testing, and rather relies only on condom usage). AIM operated without a license and was shut down last year – worse still, they only tested for 3 sexually transmitted diseases. The one reason why they were able to “contain” HIV outbreaks was because their patients had to sign a release form allowing AIM to publically disclose their test results – in other words, once a pornographic tests positive for HIV, AIM can start contacting the companies or other adult performers they’ve worked with and disclose their HIV status so that they can be refused work.

What concerns me greatly is the exposure of children to pornography – and the very limited information they are given regarding it. I would like to see it taught in sex-ed – it is just as important, if not more important, to explain to them that pornographic actors routinely catch STD’s at a much higher rate than the general population, including HIV, and that many are exploited into doing things that most people would not agree to do. And in the finale part of this three-part entry, I’ll explain even more why it is required.

Some women do prosper – I don’t hide that fact. But if you listen to what they say about pornography you realize that they’ve been moulded somehow. Marina Hantzis entered the porn industry in 2007, aged 18 under the pseudonym “Sasha Grey”. She has spoken publically defending pornography, her decision, she told her family early on, she was willing to perform “almost anything”, and she intended to get in for a few years, make “big money” and leave; and she did just that. She intends to go into mainstream acting – and while is having limited success at this at the moment, there is every possibility that she will end up like Kerman – unable to find work because of her past. After all, film director’s legitimately don’t exactly want their audience to recognize the lead female in their movie as a porn star they’ve seen perming all kinds of extreme sexual acts! She herself was exposed to pornography at 15 or so and stated this publicly in the context that she was a “fan of pron” before becoming a pornographic actress.

Hantzis got lucky – a lot luckier than Roxx; but she still might get cervical cancer or genital warts from her pornographic past because – STD’s are very high among pornographic actors. She may have been cured of the testable ones that she caught in the three years that she was active in the industry; but there are plenty of ex-porn stars out there with incurable STD’s – some even with HIV.

Roxx experienced – first hand – the industry’s selfish, conspiring, and consumed nature. In her own words she describes her dread at being told she had to perform “double anal” (by Marc Anthony) and the physical pain involved when she performed the scene. What is most notable is that Roxx claims she categorically informed her manager before travelling to San Fernando Valley from Canada that she would only film traditional sex scenes (boy-girl only, no anal, with condoms). She would soon have learned the hard way that the industry mostly rejects condom usage. She would later learn that after you’ve been there a couple of weeks you’re expected to do more (including anal, etc) than just traditional sex. The fact that her manager hadn’t informed her of this before she came shows the extent of malevolent conspiring against young, vulnerable and naïve women. Further more, managers routinely book their girls to do the things they say they don’t want to anyway; leaving the producers (in this case Marc Anthony) to put pressure on the girls (in this case Lara Roxx) at the time of shooting. Again they’re conspiring together against the participants.

At 17 Roxx had began stripping for three years, moving on to modelling and then in early 2004 she travelled to the USA to film in pornography. Performing double-anal would have caused severe tearing of the anal lining and pain, combined with the fact that James proceeded to ejaculate in her anus pretty much sealed her fate. She had worked in the industry for 2 months, and filmed 14 scenes prior to being infected; she left with HIV and essentially penniless. Like the vast majority of women who enter the porn industry, she came from a broken home.

My only observation is that pornographers typically rape and pillage and will do whatever they think they can get away with – this is certainly the case in the USA where adult performers are routinely required to participate in painful, humiliating and demeaning scenes.

Stay tuned for the gripping, and highly controversial, finale – Pornography: No child is sacred.